d-projects   projects   organizations   people   content   technology   resources   [home | site map]

resources | hopper, 1994

Summary:Organizational Structures of Successful Courseware Projects: Patterns, Opportunities and Challenges to be included in Session #1: Altered and New Relationships


 
This qualitative research explored organizational issues surrounding successful courseware projects. The following projects were the focus of this study:

The following projects, organizations and participants were the focus of this study:
 
Project: ESCAPE (HyperCard and HyperNews)
Organizations: Educational Research and Information Systems (ERIS, Purdue)
Participants: Hopper, Lawler, LeBold, Putnam, Rehwinkel, Tillotson, Ward
 
Project: TODOR (BLOX) & Mechanics 2.01 (cT, Athena)
Organizations: Athena and Academic Computing (AC, MIT)
Participants: Bucciarelli, Daly, Jackson, Lavin, Schmidt
 
Project: Physical Geology Tutor (AthenaMuse)
Organizations: Center for Educational Computing Initiatives (CECI, MIT)
Participants: Davis, Kinnicutt, Lerman, Schlusselberg
 
Project: Context32 (Intermedia, StorySpace)
Organizations: Institute for Research and Information Scholarship (IRIS, Brown)
Participants: Kahn, Landow, Yankelovich
 
[See the Switchboard for further information.]
 

Interviews with 19 key participants and information from documents concerning the projects served as the foundation of this study. Findings revealed that in complex computing environments, courseware needed to continuously evolve in order to be used over a significant period of time. Successful courseware projects evolved organizational structures to obtain and manage a continuous supply of informational, technical, human and financial resources. The nature of the support structures that developed depended upon the project manager's relationship to the more traditional academic and computing organizations. The three different types of organizational support structures that were identified resulted in distinctly different patterns of challenges and opportunities. These will be reviewed in this presentation.
 
The implications of this study are that courseware authors and project managers need to develop both rich "learning environments" and strong organizational support structures upon which continued delivery depends. The organizational structures identified during this study provide a foundation upon which to base future investigations. It will be valuable to further establish the operations, strengths and limitations of organizational structures which evolve to support courseware in advanced computing environments.
 

© Mary E. Hopper [MEHopper] | MEHopper@TheWorld.com [posted 00/00/00 | revised 02/02/02]