Leadership is always a factor of three --the leader, the follower and the
common or shared domain or communication or lowest common denominator
existing between them which defines the real relationship. I find that it
is quite easy to define the leader and follower positions, but much harder
to define the exact roles and relationships --the dynamics--which exist
between them. You might want to reference my comments about leadership in
LO5369
AWSmith Bill
>Yes, I agree that there are responsibilities of both leadership and
>followership. However, my thought on the 'agreeing to be led' piece is
>that when it comes to me --- I check out where you are leading, and if you
>have listened carefully to me and you agree to lead and take me where I
>told you I want to go, --- then I let you lead!!!
>
>Joe DiVincenzo
-- awsmith@uts.cc.utexas.edu (August W. Smith) -Info: learning-org-approval@world.std.com or <http://world.std.com/~lo/>