Bjxrg Kaspersen writes
> I've seen a number of responses to WHY we need LO's, but to me the first
> question that needs to be anwered is WHAT are LO's?
> I'm looking for a good definition of LO's -
> and preferably a definition from the literature. Can anybody help?
I don't have my copy of "The Fifth Discpline" By Senge but I believe there
is a defintion early on. Also Chris Argyris wrote in "On Organizational
Learning" in the introduction (page 1) "...the better organizationals are
at learning the more likely it is they will be able to detect and correct
errors, and to see when they are unable to detect and correct errors."
This isn't a classic text book definition but I think it is insightful.
Any one else?
Tony
Tony Barrett
University Residences
University of Idaho
Office: (208) 885-5848 (w/voice mail)
FAX: (208) 885-6606
Home Page: http://www.uidaho.edu/~tonyb
--"Tony Barrett" <tonyb@uires.RESNET.UIDAHO.EDU>
Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>