Low hanging fruit LO8390

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Susan Starr: "What is community? LO8391"
• Previous message: William O. Welsh III: "Who Decides Metrics? LO8389"
• In reply to: Michael Erickson: "Low hanging fruit LO8325"
• Next in thread: Julie Beedon: "Low hanging fruit LO8393"
• Reply: Julie Beedon: "Low hanging fruit LO8393"
• Reply: Rol Fessenden: "Low hanging fruit LO8398"
• Reply: jack hirschfeld: "Low hanging fruit LO8410"
• Reply: Bill Hendry: "Low hanging fruit LO8444"
• Reply to [ author only ][ Learning-Org list ]
  

Re: Low hanging fruit LO8325

I have just read a couple of the posts about low hanging fruit, and how
working on them doesn't really create deep and lasting change.

Is it possible that they can be used as 'stepping stones' to the greater
fruit higher up? By this I mean that if people are able to solve some
'easy' problems, they could learn some new techniques and get 'runs on the
board', which would make them feel good about themselves, and prepare them
to tackle the more difficult problems.

Could this work in practice?

Regards,
Pamela McGillivray
pmcg@acslink.aone.net.au

-- 

Pamela McGillivray <pmcg@acslink.aone.net.au>
 

     Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations
    For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>

• Next message: Susan Starr: "What is community? LO8391"
• Previous message: William O. Welsh III: "Who Decides Metrics? LO8389"
• In reply to: Michael Erickson: "Low hanging fruit LO8325"
• Next in thread: Julie Beedon: "Low hanging fruit LO8393"
• Reply: Julie Beedon: "Low hanging fruit LO8393"
• Reply: Rol Fessenden: "Low hanging fruit LO8398"
• Reply: jack hirschfeld: "Low hanging fruit LO8410"
• Reply: Bill Hendry: "Low hanging fruit LO8444"