LO list as practise field? LO12126

Richard K. Berger (rkberger@rkb.com)
Wed, 22 Jan 1997 12:49:04 -0500

Replying to LO12085 --

Malcolm Burson wrote:

> For example, the discussion on length of posting should, to my way of
> thinking, lead us to reflect on the differences in learning styles that we
> each bring to the list, and then begin to ask questions about how
> organizational learning strategies might account for, and honor, these
> differences.

[snip]

> Similarly, in the "Disappointment--no soul?" discussion, I would welcome
> the opportunity to learn from you what the implications for organizational
> behavior are, based on our common experience here. Might we generalize or
> build a model that explores what happens in organizations when heart/soul
> "breaks loose" or goes underground? Instead, we seem mostly to be
> particularizing our own experience and making assertions about it.

I agree with Malcolm. We should, perhaps, be building a learning
organization here -- for all of us. How do we do this? And, isn't this
question the meaning of the list?

-- rkb (Ricky)

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   BERGER LAW OFFICE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tel. (508) 478-9647             _/|\_               FAX: (508) 478-9648
rkberger@rkb.com                __|__                http://www.rkb.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Counsel to Business & Employees" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>