Comments on LO11807
I wish to make some comments and observations
on the title "PAY PEGGED TO LEARNING" posted by
Charles Kerr (ckerr3@pinehurst.net)
Fri, 10 Jan 1997 20:56:15 -0500
"Pay pegged to Learning" can lead to much
complication if the Focus is out-of-orbit, though
with good intention.
If LEARNING is viewed as a PROCESS, then Pay should not
be pegged to a Process, but OUTCOME of the PROCESS.
The OUTCOME must be well designed and defined with
good measurement, which imply good understanding of
SYSTEM FORCES in deriving a set of meaningful parameters.
The Structue and System on "assumption of responsibility"
should be viewed as facilitation mechanism to ensure
effective Learning Process.
Another way to look at LEARNING : if we believe that
Learning is the basic intrinsic nature of every human being,
i.e. a natural inclination, then pay need not and should not
be pegged to Learning.
Just a point of View from
Andrew Wong
Organisation Observer & Thinker
Office eMail : andreww@petronas.com.my
HomePage : http://www.geocities.com/Athens/5621
--Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>