Spirited Debate on LO LO6663

Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:27:56 -0400

Replying to LO6607 --

>Heat to me means heavy advocacy and little or no deep questioning.
>Therefore I distrust HEATED conversations as a place for real learning.
>Is this just semantics? Does Hal mean rigorous and intense when he say
>HEATED? In which case we would be agreeing.
>I dunno. It may just be a boy/girl thing. 'HEATED' and 'sharp' don't sound
>like I want in on the conversation.

Interesting, at least to me, question/comment. To me, heated = energetic.
Sharp = intelligent. But your "point" (dare i say "sharp"?) is well
taken. (But certainly not "dull") Wonder: should we be "warm" but not
heated?, not dull but never sharp?

Lord I HOPE its not so simple (complicated) as a "girl/boy" thing as you

Hal Popplewell



Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>