>However, what if the organization is attempting
>to involve 100 of these people on as many as 10 different teams dealing
>with work environment issues and process improvement? I see two realistic
>alternatives:
>
>1) A user group that (or representative groups) aids a full-time team in
>their understanding (exactly as you described) of how things are and how
>they can be.
>
>2) A part-time team, that meets weekly for a few hours, with clearly
>defined objectives.
I think another alternative would be to use 'whole system' events to pull
the data from every perspective and build a common purpose and then use
the leverage created with some key teams as described *and* with everyone
impacting change in their daily jobs...
-- Julie Beedon VISTA Consulting - for a better future julie@vistabee.win-uk.net