Responsibility vs accountability LO3222

DAVID REED (huanga@whoops.manukau.ac.nz)
Wed, 18 Oct 1995 10:51:31 NZST-12

Replying to LO3063 --

I'm thinking that if there is to be discussion
about definitions, we should go back to the source.

Therefore, for what it's worth:

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., 1991,

Accountability = Accountableness: The quality or fact of being
accountable or liable to give account and answer for conduct;
responsibility; amenableness (_to_ a person, _for_ a thing).

Earliest citation: 1688 Honyman, _Surv.Naphtali_ (1669) II 64.
Subordination to the Prince as to direction, accountableness, or
censurableness.

The earliest citation for Accountable (as in called to account) is
1583

There are 5 slightly differing definitions of 'Accountable'.
=====
Responsibility: The state or fact of being responsible.

Responsible: Answerable, accountable; liable to be called to account.

Earliest citation: 1643. Prynne _Sov. Power Parl._ III Appl. 12. To
hold this Popish erroneous opinion, that they are in no case
responsible for their whole kingdomes or Parliaments for their
grossest exorbitances.

There are 6 slightly different definitions for 'Responsible.'

Kia ora,
Annette

--
Annette Huang               Manukau Institute of Technology Library
(huanga@manukau.ac.nz)          Private Bag 94006
                                Manukau City, New Zealand

"On its own, no amount of technological development can lead to lasting happiness. What is almost always missing is a corresponding inner development." The Dalai Lama