Michael McMaster wrote:
>I prefer the idea of getting richer and more varied interpretations
>than of getting "closer to the sources" or "deeper". (I tend to
>reserve "deeper" for levels of abstraction which are useful
>linguistic tools for particular kinds of explorations.)"
Michael, I like your distinction between descriptive richness versus depth
(implying truth or accuracy?). Could you elaborate on how you use the term
"deeper" in a linguistic sense?
-- Marilyn Darling mdarling@warren.med.harvard.edu