"Errors" and Non-linear thinking LO12360

DavidCLT@aol.com
Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:08:51 -0500 (EST)

Replying to LO12313 --

In a message dated 97-02-01 22:05:42 EST, blt@eden.com (Beyond Learning)
Hal writes: " I believe the primary source of our success came from our
'non-linear thinking.' "

Dear Group: Just some thoughts about "errors" - in line with Hal's post:

1) Assume that errors are a function of our humanness, and while they can be
reduced, they will not be eliminated.
2) Engage the whole group in finding ways to recover from the errors.
Correcting many errors "privately" (using deep private logic) tends to breed
new errors.
3) Encourage effort more than performance outcomes, for if the "supportive
error correction process" is in place, more will be learned with more effort.
Perfectionistic striving leads to more obsessing and less output.
4) Complexity thinking (non-linear thinking) is "error-prone" and in line
with human nature. We cannot violate human nature and get away with it.

Warm regards, David

David L. Hanson, Ph.D.
Synergistic Psychology Associates, P.A.
Suite 204 Cameron-Brown Building
310 South McDowell Street
Charlotte, NC 28204
DavidCLT@aol.com
Author of the GEMA-Leadership Development 360 Degree instrument
"Contribution Beyond Self-interest"
"Equality is the ironclad logic of social living." - A. Adler, MD

-- 

DavidCLT@aol.com

Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>