TQM vs. LO LO11710

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Sherri Malouf: "Disappointment -- No soul? LO11711"
• Previous message: Roxanne S. Abbas: "Pay pegged to learning LO116 LO11709"
• In reply to: Ethan J. Mings: "TQM vs. LO LO11680"
• Next in thread: Mnr AM de Lange: "TQM vs LO LO11759"
• Reply to [ author only ][ Learning-Org list ]
  

I must admit that I am confused by the notion that LO is better than TQM.
To me, they are interconnected. For some time now, I have been of the
opinion that the only really successful organizations are those that value
1) learning, 2) globalism, 3) quality, and 4) diversity--not necessarily
in that order--and that none of these values can really exist in the
absence of the others.

What am I missing here?

Robert Ingram
Ingram Communications

-- 

Robert Ingram <ingram_b@ix.netcom.com>
 

     Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations
    For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>

• Next message: Sherri Malouf: "Disappointment -- No soul? LO11711"
• Previous message: Roxanne S. Abbas: "Pay pegged to learning LO116 LO11709"
• In reply to: Ethan J. Mings: "TQM vs. LO LO11680"
• Next in thread: Mnr AM de Lange: "TQM vs LO LO11759"