In a message dated 96-05-07 20:20:23 EDT, you write:
>John, I'm not so sure about this conclusion. Our genes are the product of
>several hundreds of thousands of years, and they seem to build more
>feeling or emotional parts of our brains than thinking parts. If this is
>true 'US' may be more emotional than logical. Particlarly in situations
>that have risk, to our selves or our jobs (same thing?) we may react from
>our emotions rather than logically.
I'm merely trying to point out that the "division" between emotion and
logic is, IMHO, illusory. My text sought to show that we evaluate
emotions, at least their appropriateness to a circumstance, logically. We
can also be horrified or happy about a logically-derived conclusion. So
why divide them? Instead, why not *unify* them?
Hal Popplewell
GaltJohn22@aol.com
--Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>