Richard Karash[rkarash@karash.com] wrote:
>Yes, this certainly is grist for the conversation...
>
>I agree that it's quite possible to do damage and that this can happen=20
>with consultants.
>
snip>
>I worry that if a set of LO-focused activities is started =
(pronouncements,
>training programs, etc.) and then nothing appears to have changed... =
Have
>we actually done harm (people more cynical)? Or is this a positive step =
in
>that some individuals may have transformed their lives and careers, =
even
>if the company as a whole doesn't change.=20
>
I've got strong opinions on this one, but mixed emotions. I opine that =
change in this direction is mandatory, but I'm also well aware of the =
"flavor of the week" syndrome it can create if improperly approached. =
In the end of my thinking on it, the risk of a bad taste in some mouths =
is balanced by the knowledge that individual transformations have =
occurred and that there is some learning history which may reemerge at a =
time when the organization is better lead.
-- John Zavacki The Wolff Group 900 James Avenue Scranton, PA 18510 Phone: 717-346-1218 Fax: 717-346-1388 jzavacki@epix.netLearning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>