Spirited Debate on LO LO6755

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Christian Giroux: "Intro -- Christian Giroux LO6756"
• Previous message: Keith Cowan: "Learning about Learning LO6754"
• In reply to: GaltJohn22@aol.com: "Spirited Debate on LO LO6720"
• Next in thread: Scott R. Cypher: "Error - Pls ignore LO6770"
• Reply: Scott R. Cypher: "Error - Pls ignore LO6770"
• Reply: Scott R. Cypher: "Spirited Debate on LO LO6771"
• Reply to [ author only ][ Learning-Org list ]
  

I believe the opposite of polite is impolite not spirited. And yes, I
think it best that we try to maintain a courteous tone in our discourse
whenever possible. That is the environment in which most people learn more
easily.

Nina Malyshev
ninam@muskox.alaska.edu

On Tue, 16 Apr 1996 GaltJohn22@aol.com wrote:

> Replying to LO6660 --
>
>
> To me the choice is: do we want to be polite but illogical or do we want
> to be spirited but logical. I suppose we could be polite AND logical but
> then we would miss out on at least some learning experiences.
>

-- 

Nina Malyshev <ninam@muskox.alaska.edu>
 

     Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations
    For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>

• Next message: Christian Giroux: "Intro -- Christian Giroux LO6756"
• Previous message: Keith Cowan: "Learning about Learning LO6754"
• In reply to: GaltJohn22@aol.com: "Spirited Debate on LO LO6720"
• Next in thread: Scott R. Cypher: "Error - Pls ignore LO6770"
• Reply: Scott R. Cypher: "Error - Pls ignore LO6770"
• Reply: Scott R. Cypher: "Spirited Debate on LO LO6771"