Yes, things have changed some. According to James Thompson's
"Organizations in Action," (1967) organization would tend to protect their
core technology by, among other things, buffering. It was competitive
then to accumulate slack resources to protect the firm from fluctuations
of different kind. Today, those slack resources are seen as wastted
resources. J-I-T inventories, for instance, have changed all that. Now a
firm becomes more competitive if it can achive J-I-T with external
suppliers, and in their internal processes. Likewise, economies of the
scale have become to some extent to be seen as a lost of comeptitiveness.
Achieving economies of scale, at least in the traditional sense, means to
accumulate resources, production capabilities, etc.. In today's business
environment it represents a big loss in flexibility. All the outsourcing
and other forms have changed the notion of economies of scale!
Ivan,
-- *************************************************************** R. IVAN BLANCO, Ph.D. Voice 305 899-3515 Assoc. Prof. & Director Fax 305 892-6412 International Business Programs Andreas School of Business _________E-Mail Addresses________ Barry University Bitnet: Blanco%bu4090@Barryu Miami Shores, FL 33161-6695 Internet: Blanco@bu4090.barry.edu <<<<< ---------------- >>>>> "Si un hombre fuera necesario para sostener el Estado, este Estado no deberia existir." "If one man were necessary to sustain a Nation, this Nation should not exist." Simon Bolivar ===============================================================Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>