Rol said
> So, in summary, one can _say_ that of course organizations learn because
> they have survived, improved, evolved. However, that is not enough to
> meet a new, technical, more powerful definition. If we can succeed in
> defining this new concept, we willl be one step further along in being
> able to replicate very powerful organizations. We are not there yet, but
> we some clarity about what is excluded.
There's a definition from Peter Senge at
http://web.mit.edu/entforum/www/focus_online/Fall95/ask_mit/AskMITFa95.html
The address should be copied as one line to be used in a WWW browser.
The beginning of his definition is
"A learning organization is a particular vision of an enterprise that
has the capacity to continually enhance its capabilities to shape
its future."
The information is presented in a pleasant way.
I would be interested in knowing if WWW addresses are helpful to
others on the list.
-----
Host's Note: World Wide Web addresses are welcome here anytime to
supplement a message. I'd prefer not to see messages that have *only* a
web address and are therefore not intelligible to others.
-- Rick Karash, rkarash@karash.com, host for learning-org
------
-- Have a nice day John Paul Fullerton jpf6745@acs.tamu.edu