Re: System Measurability LO3385

Richard Karash (rkarash@world.std.com)
Mon, 23 Oct 1995 18:36:20 -0400 (EDT)

Replying to LO3356 --

On Sat, 21 Oct 1995, Ben Budiman wrote:

> First I would like to thank our host Mr. Rick Karash for letting me join
> the gathering last September in which I met and got involved in very
> interesting conversations with several people.

You're welcome! For the 95% of the list who missed the party -- it was
terrific. Don't miss the next one!

> At the moment I am doing a special study, just _for kicks_ and credit, on
> system measurability. I'm currently asking myself a question if a certain
> measure of a system really represents the state of the systems as
> intended.

Hello Ben --

I think that there is a question "for what purpose?" that has to be asked
every time you try to assess whether a measure or a model "really
represents" a system or it's present state.

>From years of working with models, it's clear to me that we have to be
judging appropriateness for a purpose when we try to evaluate any model.
I think the same applies to measures trying to represent the state of a
system.

--
         Richard Karash ("Rick") |  <http://world.std.com/~rkarash>
     Innovation Associates, Inc. |    email: rkarash@world.std.com
 3 Speen St, Framingham MA 01701 | Host for Learning-Org Mailing List
 (508) 879-8301 and fax 626-2205 |     <http://world.std.com/~lo>