Hi,
Michael McMaster wrote:
>While in some contexts learning is usefully considered as "multi-staged",
>in the broader and more general context, I think it's more useful to think
>of learning as interconnected webs which have different levels of
>abstraction or interdependence but no ultimate "hier" or "lower" and no
>abstractly "better starting place".
If there is a hierarchy of learning, this suggests that that hierarchy
changes over time. System leverage points possibly change over time.
Problems possibly change over time as well. Maybe this is part of the
"wicked problem" phenomenom.
What would be the implications of a heterarchy, as opposed to a hierachy, of
learning levels?
-- Andrew Moreno amoreno@cyberspace.org