Re: The Meaning of Holism L LO1902

Jim Michmerhuizen (jamzen@world.std.com)
Fri, 30 Jun 1995 23:45:22 +0059 (EDT)

Replying to LO1856 --

Ah Barry - what do I love so much about your response? This: many
people, mildly challenged to defend "vibrations", would retreat into some
more formal, more constrained language. You did not: you jumped out into
things wilder and freer than we began with. And so we have our vibrations
after all, you and I, and we've escaped the twaddle of trying to defend
them in pseudo-scientific occultism.

And thanks.

On 29 Jun 1995, Barry Mallis wrote:

> Reply to: RE>>The Meaning of Holism LO1832
>
> Answering Jim Michmerhuizen's questions to me about the meaning of
> "vibration"
>
> Yes, yes, and yes. Vibration is an "occult" catch-all for everything that
> emanates from us. The romantic, fuzzy-edged meaning for such a word is
> dangerous, as I think your critique suggests.
>
> But I'll stick to it.

--
Regards
     Jim Michmerhuizen
     web residence at     http://world.std.com/~jamzen/
...........................................................................
. . . . There are far *fewer* things in heaven and earth, Horatio,  . . . .
 . . . . .       than are dreamt of in your philosophy...        . . | _ .