Two suggested books are *A Dream Deferred* by Philip Slater, which
describes why authoritarianism (which is what you're calling patriarchy;
the latter is a specific instance of the former) appears to be efficient,
but isn't; and *No Contest: The Case Against Competition* by Alfie Kohn,
which is a review of the psychological literature on competition and
cooperation (and also contains precise definitions of these terms)
suggesting that competition (defined as a situation in which for one
person to reach his goal, someone else has to be prevented from reaching
his) really doesn't work as well as we think it does.
It *is* very important to be precise when talking about "competition" and
"cooperation"; in the sense in which they apply to organizations, the *do
not" mean "dominance" and "submission" (Kohn points out that a lot of
people misuse "cooperation" to mean "obedience"; he defines cooperation
as a situation in which one person can reach his goal only as a result of
a process that enables others to reach their goals as well). A simple
example I use to illustrate these terms is to people trying to push a
large box across a floor; they're competing if they get on opposite sides
and push; they're cooperating if they get on the same side and push.
-----
ebohlman@netcom.com (Eric Bohlman) <<-- Sig line added by your Host
-----
Host's Note: It would help me and our colleagues if everyone would include
a "sig" at the end of your message with at least your email address. Some
of our colleagues on learning-org have mail readers which do not show the
"From:" address.
-- Rick Karash, rkarash@world.std.com, host for learning-org