blogging for our lives

September 6, 2004


"We are a gentle, angry people and we are singing,
Singing for our lives "-- Holly Near

"We can best help you to prevent war not by repeating your words and following your methods but by finding new words and creating new methods. "-- Virginia Woolf

The fall calendar for the Center for New Words came in the mail a few days ago. I noticed that Natalie Davis will be be teaching a blogging workshop for women and girls in November. The blurb for the workshop claims "Blogging is emerging as a powerful opinion-making force, but though the technology is fairly cheap and widely available, most blogs are still written by men." Shades of the inverse Todd Napolitano theory! Are most online journals written by women? Are most blogs written by men? Is there a difference? And what's so important anyway? An awful lot of blogs, at least the ones I've stumbled upon, are about baseball, pets, cute photos of the blogger's children, parenting, writing, books, or things like coding in Python or PHP, not so much opinion-making on world issues. Of course, my most virulent opinions are about baseball. Do we really need more women blogging about how the Yankees are the source of all evil in the universe when everybody who cares thinks that already? Whose mind am I going to change? I've been going on and on in my recently created blog, stercus, about the removal of the marbled murrelet from the endangered species list so that the Bush administration can allow logging of its (the murrelet's) habitat in old-growth forest. That's hardly an A-list issue in this day and age of war against invisible enemies just waiting for us to let our guard down. It's not like the marbled murrelet is important to homeland security. But I digress. Back to the gender divisions in the blogosphere.

First of all, what is the gender breakdown of all blogs in the blogosphere? How many by men? How many by women? How many by men pretending to be women or women pretending to be men? Does a blog have gender? I don't know how to find that out quickly. I'd love to know how Natalie Davis got the stats.

Second, what is the topic breakdown of the blogosphere? How many are political opinion? How many are personal? How many are about baseball (seems like a lot out there)? How many are about cute puppies? Gardens? What the folks at bookfinder.com are reading this week? Food?

Third, once you've isolated the ones that are in fact political opinion, what's the gender breakdown of those? Are men overrepresented in political opinion blogs? Similarly, are women overrepresented in food blogs? I'd venture a guess that women form the majority of bloggers who write about dieting, but I have no statistics to back that up. Anyway, I'm stymied on how to research the blogosphere demographics in any organized way quicklly enough to blog about it, were this a blog.

No, I don't regard Journal of a Sabbatical, for which I desperately need a new name now that I'm not on sabbatical, as a blog. It's not links and commentary. The entries are too long. I don't use a blogging tool. I don't compose on line. I reread and revise (though you'd never know it by the idiotic typos I miss). And worst of all, it's about my own life. Granted, it's my own life as embedded in the world. I think one of the things that makes blogging hard for me is that it's hard for me to have binary opinions on some things. Compassion for all beings requires me to respect the lives of all people, animals, and plants, not just American lives, lives of charismatic megafauna popular with Republicans, and lives of plants Republicans make into paper. Oh, and to be fair and balanced, I'd have to point out that in New England, especially Massachusetts and Rhode Island, some of the politicians who have done the most for the environment have been Republicans. Frank Sargent as governor of Massachusetts stopped the bizarre highway project that would have sliced Boston right down the middle, and did other good environmental stuff, and then in Rhode Island we had John Chafee in the US Senate protecting clean air and safe drinking water and be sure to thank him the next time a double-hulled oil tanker runs aground and a huge oil spill is averted as he's the one who pushed the double hull legislation through Congress. That was only a semi-digression. Back to the embedded life.

By embedded in life I mean that I am part of the action and passion of my times (thank you, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes) whether I want to be or not. Looking back over the past two years, I can see where some of the major news stories intersected with my life -- and I don't just mean traffic jams, floods, and snow storms. I mean war. I mean gay marriage. I mean unemployment -- is it the economy stupid or the stupid economy. I mean life.

From the moment that BiB left for Kuwait (when the war hadn't even started yet but we all knew it was going to happen) to the moment that he'd had enough of being a target in Iraq and moved to Our Nation's Capital there were moments like this one (again before the war even started but wicked scary) when I was crazy with fear for his safety. For a long time, every news story about a civilian contractor killed in Iraq had me jumping out of my skin. Even now I feel that "ohmigod that could've been my brother" feeling when I hear news about employees of the company he works for being killed or kidnapped. I take a deep breath and remind myself that it's somebody else's brother. Selfish, but calming.

From the day of the Goodridge decision to the day equal marriage became law in Massachusetts to the day of the Beach Boys' wedding to the constant "Are you and Nancy going to get married?" question, equal marriage for same sex couples is a fact of my life. When you're part of the news, do you see it as news? Is my overwhelming joy news? And no, Nancy and I have no plans to get married but it makes me feel more like a full member of society to know that we can.

From the first loomings of the doom of InfiniBand to the demise of Starship Startup, about which the journal is fairly quiet except for a brief mention of my being laid off, to my efforts to find gainful employment in the jobless recovery when I am perhaps best qualified for the old tech writers' home or the old programmers' home, the economy isn't news it's my life.

Even the mention of New Words with which I began the entry is related to my life. Back in the early 1970s, a friend of La Madre's was a member of the original collective that started New Words back when they were in Somerville, before Cambridge. For my birthday that year, La Madre gave me a pile of feminist books from her friend's bookstore. I went to the party for the first anniversary of New Words. The name, by the way, came from that Virginia Woolf quote. It seems like I've been part of the action and passion of our times the whole darn time. I just haven't been blogging about it.

We are women and we are blogging, blogging for our lives.

Today's Reading
Birds in the Bush by Bradford Torrey

This Year's Reading
2004 Booklist

Today's Starting Pitcher
Bronson Arroyo


Before

Journal Index

After


Home

Copyright © 2004, Janet I. Egan